Interesting and impactful research: on phenomena, theory, and writing (2022)

Most researchers assume that research is a quest for truth. So, the discovery of truth would automatically be impactful. However, research is impactful not if it is true, but if it refutes the assumption (belief) of its audience (Davis 1971). Refuting the assumption of the audience is also what makes it interesting. The truthfulness of a proposition is of limited duration. Every proposition or theory will ultimately be proved wrong as new research emerges and knowledge accumulates. What matters is merely whether the research runs counter to what is currently assumed as true. That’s interesting. That’s impactful. Let’s consider some examples.

Four examples

One of the most interesting and impactful theories in the last 200years is the theory of evolution. Why so? The reason is that it refuted the strong beliefs of millions of people around the world that extant species of life were created by one or more gods. Darwin postulated that all the variety of living things evolved from simpler life forms. This theory is still interesting and controversial because millions of people around the world still strongly believe in creation. Indeed, in recent decades, some such believers have tried to espouse a rival theory to evolution called creationism. They want to suggest that creation is not merely a belief system but a scientific theory like evolution. Non-believers in evolution repeatedly throw up a simple classic counterexample to evolution. How could humans have evolved from monkeys? Thus, evolution is perennially interesting and impactful to many, because about 157years after its first formal propounding, it still seems to refute common beliefs and perceptions.

Evolution is enormously impactful. It provides the most parsimonious explanation for the death of now extinct species, the origin of new species, the variety of existing species, and their seemingly exquisite match to the environment. It has also enlightened paleontology, genetics, embryology, and other natural sciences.

Similarly, the theory of relativity is perennially interesting and impactful. It’s interesting because even today its premises refute our common misperceptions about the world. We think that time is absolute and speed is relative. But the theory suggests that time is relative and the speed of light (in a vacuum) is absolute and independent of the source. Likewise, the impact of the theory has been enormous, enlightening our understanding of the universe, light, space travel, time, gravity, and many other issues.

These two examples are classic ones from the field of natural science. Numerous examples exist in the field of economics, management, and marketing. I will cite just two, market pioneering and mental accounting.

For decades, economists proposed the theory of first-mover advantage, which said that the first to enter a market had some enduring advantage over later entrants to the market. Marketing researchers further elaborated that to mean overwhelming advantage in terms of market share, success, and long-term market leadership. However, Golder and Tellis (1993) refuted this notion of pioneering advantage attributing it to survival bias, self-report bias, and weak measures of pioneers. With good measures free from biases, they found that pioneers mostly fail, have low long-term market share, and are rarely long-term leaders in their markets. Because the authors refuted a strong theory in economics, marketing, and management, their thesis was interesting, has earned high Google citations, and won the Odell Award for Long Term Contributions in the Journal of Marketing Research. The thesis continues to be interesting. Many economists, strategists, and lawyers who have not heard of or do not believe in Golder and Tellis (1993)Footnote 1 continue to propose pioneering advantage as a reason for success. Reporters continue to cite first mover-advantage whenever they describe the success of a market entrant, casually redefining the market or the order of entry to show the advantage. Students continue to offer first-mover advantage as a reason for firms that succeed or late mover disadvantages for others that fail. Here again, casual redefinition of order of entry or the market is used to fit the conclusion.

Likewise, Richard Thaler’s theory of mental accounting is highly interesting and impactful. Economists typically believe that a dollar is a dollar in every context. Likewise, investors believe that money should be moved among accounts to the one where returns are the maximum. Such beliefs rely on the fungibility of money. However, Thaler showed that consumers do not behave according to this principle. Rather they maintain separate mental accounts that violate this principle. A simple example is a consumer who saves in a bank account at very low interest a sum of money to purchase a home. The same consumer also maintains credit card debt of a lesser amount, at very high interest. The consumer can pay off all of his or her debt with some of the bank savings to reduce monthly interest payments—but will not. Thaler went on to propose his theory of mental accounting that explains a number of anomalies in people’s borrowing, saving, and use of money. His work on mental accounting has led to thousands of citations and may yet earn him a Nobel prize. Thaler’s work is perennially interesting, because it still is difficult for consumers to understand the fungibility of money and use it accordingly.

These four examples show how propositions that refute beliefs are inherently interesting and impactful.

Characteristics of interesting

Editors and reviewers use a variety of synonyms for interesting, like aha, wow, new, novel, punchline, surprising, counter-intuitive, refutational, fascinating, insightful. Editors and reviewers may not go beyond these words to explain what they really want. This essay suggests that what is common to all these words is a premise that refutes the assumptions of the audience. What editors and reviewers really want is a premise that refutes what is assumed or believed. Before writing or presenting, the researcher can ascertain this fact by three simple questions: What have I found? What do people believe about it? Does the finding refute their belief? A positive answer justifies moving to the next step. A negative answer suggests further research. Many times authors fail to emphasize the interesting when they submit their papers. A few times they fail to do so even after getting the paper accepted.

Counter-intuitive premises vary in the degree to which they are interesting. This can be seen in a simple plot of audience response (vertical axis) to the refutational strength of a premise (horizontal axis) (see Fig.1). Attention (red line) increases linearly with the strength of the refutation. However, persuasion or buy-in (yellow curve) is bell-shaped. Initially, the stronger the refutation, the greater the degree of buy in, up to a point (fascination). Beyond this point, the refutation earns more negative than positive response, leading to shock and ultimate rejection (absurd). So the ideal is to get a response of “interesting” or “fascinating” but not “absurd.” For example, today evidence that the earth is round is overwhelming. So, a paper by members of the flat-earth society arguing why the earth is flat would be desk-rejected as absurd. Authors need to carefully craft their propositions to elicit the most positive buy-in from the widest audience without the paper being rejected as either boring or absurd.

Audience reponse to refutation. Adapted from Tellis (2016), Effective advertising, 2nd edition,forthcoming

Full size image

Audiences themselves differ in their priors and thus in what they consider interesting. Take the example of evolution. Staunch believers of the theory would find a claim of evolution boring. Staunch believers of creationism would find a claim of evolution absurd. It’s probably a majority in the middle who find it interesting. So, authors need to know their audiences and position and craft the proposition carefully to persuade the target audience.

Where to begin?

Every beginner faces this question. The classic answer that scholars give a beginner is start with the literature. Why so? The reasons are straightforward. The literature contains what is known. It also contains proven models and methods to guide the new researcher. Most importantly, the literature reveals limitations that the new researcher can address or gaps that the new researcher can fill. Others recommend that theories are useful as they enlighten data and enable one to see phenomena. But is this really true?

I would like to offer an alternative approach. The literature contains established theories, which make a large number of assumptions. By the time the novice has amassed the tools to understand these theories, he or she may have already become a believer of the theory’s assumptions. Such beliefs may color the young researcher’s perception of the world. He or she may see the world through the eyes of the established researcher and be less likely to refute it. That may be why for generations, no economist challenged the belief in the fungibility of money, which Thaler finally refuted, or in pioneering advantage, which Golder and Tellis refuted.

Likewise, the literature contains methods and models that require training to understand. By the time the novice has fully understood these, his or her perception of the world and of data may be biased. Such biases may limit the novice’s discovery of new phenomena. The list of limitations available at the end of existing literature could inspire the novice. However, the long list of limitations may also demotivate and discourage the novice into further research into the area.

So where to begin? Perhaps, begin with the phenomenon. The new researcher could immerse himself or herself into the phenomenon, understand it deeply, and view it with fresh eyes, without the bias of prior theories and the interpretations of prior models and methods. Each person has a unique worldview born of his or her unique experiences and background over decades. This unique worldview is precious. It is priceless. Insight occurs when the fresh worldview of the novice meets a new phenomenon. Once the novice has fully grasped, understood, and analyzedthis phenomenon, he or she is in a good position to contrast it with the current literature and challenge or refute exiting beliefs of the phenomenon.

(Video) #10 LECTURE: Impactful research

Phenomenon before theory

Conventional wisdom advocates theory before data. The above approach espouses phenomenon before theory. This approach arises from decades of conducting research, navigating the review process, advising dozens of doctoral students and post-doctoral scholars, and steering numerous authors through the review process. Here are some reasons why this approach may have merit.

First, what is a good theory? A good theory is just a simple explanation for a phenomenon. So, without a phenomenon, there is nothing to explain. Thus, to develop a new theory, one needs careful observation of a phenomenon. Immersing oneself into the phenomenon ensures the best chance to develop a new theory.

Second, theories come and go. Phenomena stay with us forever. Phenomena may be the bedrock of theory. So, it may be better to start with the phenomenon rather than the theory.

Third, observing a phenomenon with fresh eyes unbiased by prior theory, method, or model, may enable fresh insight.

On the other hand, putting theory before data has some issues. It may lead us to borrow imperfect theories rather than develop fresh ones. It may cause researchers to complicate theories as they adapt them to the new context. It may lead to the beaten path of prior explanations rather than to new explanations. And it may result in long convoluted papers rather than short, elegant ones.

How long will it take?

Data reveal their secrets only slowly. Good research takes time. Insight takes years to crystallize. Only very tiny bits accumulate each day. Highly impactful theories take decades to formulate. Let’s return to the great examples from science.

Many people now believe in evolution. Some marvel at its beauty. However, very few know about its development. Charles Darwin, who espoused the theory, was not an evolutionist. Rather he was a naturalist, biologist, and geologist. He did not start with a grand theory of evolution. Rather he began research by observing and collecting species of plants, animals, and fossils. He also began to travel widely to better collect diverse species. He carried on such observation, collection, and reflection for about 25years. During this time, a theory of evolution gradually began to take shape in his mind. He did so to try explain the diversity of species, their differentiation in isolated islands, their exquisite matching to various environments, and yet their common bone structures. Thus, this great theory was the fruit of a lifetime of observation, data collection, and reflection in the field. Long and careful empirics preceded and yielded great theory.

Likewise, Johannes Kepler is famous for espousing the laws of planetary motion. But how did he come to these simple laws? Kepler’s mentor was Tycho Brahe. Tycho Brahe himself spent about 25years documenting the motions of the then known six planets. He believed that the sun revolved around the earth, as was common at that time. However, Brahe had to invent numerous cycles and epicycles in each planet’s motion to explain them with an earth-centered solar system. After Brahe’s death, Kepler inherited these data and brought a fresh look. He began extensive analyses to try to explain Brahe’s extensive data. Through the course of these analyses he arrived at various insights that led him to the formulation of three laws of planetary motion. Here again, a great theory of planetary motion emerged from decades of careful and painful empirical observation and extensive analyses of the data. In today’s world with massive databases, collaborative data collection, instantaneous communication through the internet, and large communities of scientists, observation may not take a quarter century. But it does take time. And good theory will continue to emerge from fresh observation, recording, and analysis of phenomena.

In praise of simplicity

What’s a good theory? A good theory is a simple explanation for a phenomenon. The best theory is the simplest explanation for a wide set of phenomena. This premise runs against many criticisms made by young reviewers. They often complain, “this theory is too simple,” or “this regression model harks back to something done 20years back.” Really? So what? Simplicity is not a limitation. Simplicity is a virtue. It is the paramount virtue of a theory. Advice from theoreticians, sometimes attributed to Einstein, suggests that a theory should be as simple as possible to fully explain the phenomenon but no simpler. Now let’s return to our examples from science.

Brahe’s earth-centered system required numerous cycles and epicycles of planetary motion to account for the data. In contrast, with a sun-centered system and elliptical orbits, Kepler’s theory required only three premises to explain the motion of planets.Footnote 2 That’s it. Just three premises were enough for all that data. Those three premises explained what had baffled astronomers for thousands of years from ancient Mesopotamia to medieval Europe. The theory punctured myths and religious beliefs about planetary origin and motion that had sprouted across all continents spanning millennia.

(Video) Methodology and Sections for Conceptual Papers: Writing Impactful Research Programme (Session 10)

Darwin’s theory of evolution is perhaps even simpler. Its original formFootnote 3 required just two premises, random variation (later mutation) and natural selection. Mutations occur randomly in all species. Those that provide better adaptation to the environment get naturally selected through survival and procreation. What seemed like maddening diversity is really simple mutation and selection. What seemed purposeful is really random. What seemed divine is really natural.

A plea for brevity

Simplicity’s twin virtue is brevity. If you can stay simple, you can be brief. If you strive for brevity, you will find simplicity. Actually, quality of writing improves with brevity. As we write and rewrite, we can use smaller words, use shorter sentences, trim redundant phrases, and streamline arguments. The end result is a short, forceful, idea-packed essay.

Why do our papers need to be 50 pages long? The journals with the highest impact factor in science get the job done in four pages! In that space, our papers merely cover the introduction. Have we perhaps sacrificed brevity and simplicity at the altars of complexity, jargon, and noise?

Pitfalls in phenomenological approach

The proposed phenomenological approach to create impactful and interesting research has some pitfalls. These are traps or blind spots that imperil the inferences. Here are brief notes on five of the most common of these in important phenomena in economics, management, and marketing.


Researchers typically study just a sample of the population. The danger is that the sample is selective and not representative of the population. A selective sample can lead to the wrong inference. Take pioneering advantage, for example. The sample often used to study pioneering advantage was firms that could be surveyed (Golder and Tellis 1993). However, such an approach sampled survivors and omitted failed pioneers, resulting in a severe bias in favoring of pioneering advantage. What went wrong? Researchers wanted to understand why pioneers were successful. But they sampled only surviving (successful firms). So they sampled on the dependent variable of interest. Question to ask: have I sampled on the dependent variable?


Most phenomena in economics, management, or marketing are dynamic. Looking at them statically loses vital dynamics that may result in wrong inferences. For example, market analysts often attribute the success of innovators to luck: being at the right place at the right time. That is surely how it seems with a one-shot look at the market when the innovator introduces the innovation that takes off. In-depth study over a long time period before the introduction would reveal the innovator’s long quest, numerous missteps, lessons learned, relentless perseverance, and whole life commitment to the endeavor (Tellis and Golder 2001). Really luck had nothing to do with success. Question to ask: how does this phenomenon evolve over time?


Observers of the product lifecycle always mention decline as a necessary stage that plagues every product. Decline seems like some pre-ordained limit, just like death is encoded in an organism’s genes. However, there is nothing preordained about decline. Successful products do not decline on their own due to some genetic encoding. They decline due to competition from a radical innovation that renders them obsolete (Palacios and Tellis 2015). If the firm does not embrace these innovations, competitors will. Question to ask: what impact does competition have on this phenomenon?

Reverse causality

Most models of firm behavior suggest that structure leads to strategy that leads to performance. Very few allow for a reverse path from success to strategy. However, many firms suffer from the incumbent’s curse, where success leads to glorification of the past, complacency, and blindness to the next big innovation (Chandy and Tellis 2000). Success sows the seeds of failure. So, a reverse path runs from success to strategy. Ignoring such reverse causality can lead to false inferences and blindness to important insights. Question to ask: can the dependent variable affect the alleged cause?


Disruption has become a big word in today’s markets. The prevailing wisdom is that established firms get disrupted by new entrants. But is this always true? Not if one considers heterogeneity in the culture of firms (Tellis 2013). A few firms realize that success sows the seeds of failure and adopt practices to avoid this trap. These firms develop an entrepreneurial culture that offers asymmetric incentives, empowers innovators, and fosters internal competition. Omitting heterogeneity in culture blinds the researcher to important insights. Question to ask: is this really equally true of all agents?

You can have your cake and eat it

The approach outlined here is tough. The path is long, lonely, and costly. Even after one collects a great deal of data, one still needs creativity. One has to see the new pattern in the whole data, as Kepler did: when the sun is set as the center of the solar system with elliptical orbits, the planets follow three neat laws. Authors need to rise above their data to have this Kepler vision or discovery. Moreover, the review process is brutal. Most papers get rejected at good journals. Many reviewers want a theory before delving into the phenomenon. Some reviewers also want consistency with the literature and may not be partial to refutation, especially if it is their own work. So positioning needs to be very careful. The toughest hurdle is criticism, which is tough to receive from others but easy to provide to others. Editors themselves may encourage critical reviews in order to make sure the paper has been properly vetted.

But if an author perseveres with the research, is immersed in the phenomenon, takes a fresh look, and sees the novel pattern, a counter-intuitive finding may emerge. Then the task falls to good framing around the surprising finding, careful positioning, simple writing, and short essays.

Many are calling for home-grown theories. The approach outlined here allows one to have one’s cake and eat it. It will allow for a home-grown theory and one that is boundary expanding. It will allow for papers that are short and interesting. It will help create research that is impactful and relevant. It will yield new phenomena and home grown theories.

We live in a time-strapped but information-profuse world. Millions of pieces of new information hit consumers every day. Who will read our work? The title of our paper needs to describe our work. But it also needs to grab an audience. It must be interesting! Being interesting is not an option. It is an imperative. It is the goal of research. The same factors that make a paper interesting will also make it impactful.


  1. Replications of Golder and Tellis have been very sparse.

  2. Roughly, 1) Planets move in ellipses around the sun.; 2) Planets sweep out equal areas in equal times; 3) The square of the planet’s year divided by the cube of its mean distance from the sun is a constant.

  3. Developments since then have incorporated more premises to account for related phenomena.

(Video) Philosophy of Research: Writing Impactful research (3rd Session)


  • Chandy, R., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. (1971). That’s interesting! towards a phenomenology of sociology & a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(1971), 309–344.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Golder, P. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1993). Pioneering advantage: marketing logic or marketing legend. Journal of Marketing Research, 158–170.

  • Palacios, J. & Tellis, G. J. (2015). The dive and disruption of successful products: patterns, drivers, and predictive model. Product Innovation and Management Journal, 33(1), 53–68.

  • Tellis, G. J. (2013). Unrelenting innovation: How to create a culture of market dominance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-bass.

  • Tellis, G. J. & Golder, P. (2001). Will and vision: How latecomers grow to dominate markets. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0808, USA

    Gerard J. Tellis


  1. Gerard J. Tellis

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

(Video) Intricacies of Doing Research on Sharing Platforms: Theory, Methodology, and Pitfalls

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard J. Tellis.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Interesting and impactful research: on phenomena, theory, and writing (2)

Cite this article

Tellis, G.J. Interesting and impactful research: on phenomena, theory, and writing. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 1–6 (2017).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Which research is concerned with phenomena? ›

ABSTRACT. As the guest editors state, 'Phenomenon-driven research is problem-oriented research that focuses on capturing, documenting, and conceptualizing organizational and managerial phenomena of interest in order to facilitate knowledge creation and advancement' (Schwarz & Stensaker, 2015.

What makes up a good theory How do theories explain phenomena? ›

Characteristics of a good theory

The University of California, Berkeley (opens in new tab), defines a theory as "a broad, natural explanation for a wide range of phenomena. Theories are concise, coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable, often integrating and generalizing many hypotheses."

What is a phenomena in research? ›

A phenomenon (plural, phenomena) is a general result that has been observed reliably in systematic empirical research. In essence, it is an established answer to a research question.

What makes an interesting research? ›

Most researchers assume that research is a quest for truth. So, the discovery of truth would automatically be impactful. However, research is impactful not if it is true, but if it refutes the assumption (belief) of its audience (Davis 1971). Refuting the assumption of the audience is also what makes it interesting.

What are the 7 types of research questions? ›

Qualitative Research Question Types
  • Exploratory Questions. Questions that are designed to understand more about a topic are exploratory questions. ...
  • Predictive Questions. ...
  • Interpretive Questions. ...
  • Descriptive Questions. ...
  • Comparative Questions. ...
  • Relationship-Based Questions.

What are some famous theories? ›

Sign Up For the Latest from Science News
  • Plate tectonics: Alfred Wegener, 1912; J. ...
  • Statistical mechanics: James Clerk Maxwell, Ludwig Boltzmann, J. ...
  • Special relativity: Albert Einstein, 1905. ...
  • General relativity: Einstein, 1915.
Nov 13, 2013

Where can I find theories for research? ›

The best place to start to find theory and theorist information is the library catalog through the library homepage. Use precise language such as theory titles and theorist names to see resources that are related to those topics and people.

What is an example of a phenomenon in psychology? ›

Psychological phenomena are those manifested in human behaviors and responses. The sunk cost effect, for example, is the tendency for humans to continue investing in something that clearly isn't working.

How do you write a phenomenon in research? ›

Phenomenon | How to Write Your Research Paper or Thesis 1

What are the types of phenomenon? ›

Types of natural phenomena include: Weather, fog, thunder, tornadoes; biological processes, decomposition, germination; physical processes, wave propagation, erosion; tidal flow, moonbow, blood moon and natural disasters such as electromagnetic pulses, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, midnight sun and polar night.

Which type of research focuses on the why and what of the phenomenon? ›

Qualitative research is a process of naturalistic inquiry that seeks an in-depth understanding of social phenomena within their natural setting. It focuses on the "why" rather than the "what" of social phenomena and relies on the direct experiences of human beings as meaning-making agents in their every day lives.

What is a good research topic? ›

Some common research paper topics include abortion, birth control, child abuse, gun control, history, climate change, social media, AI, global warming, health, science, and technology. But we have many more! On this page, we have hundreds of good research paper topics across a wide range of subject fields.

What is the role of research in terms of explaining phenomena? ›

Research is the process of collecting and analyzing information to increase our understanding of phenomena. This process of inquiry can be as simple as investigating through observation or as complex as experimenting to establish a cause-effect relationship for the events we investigate.

Why should a research topic be interesting? ›

A topic that interests you

Even professionals and researchers in advance level conduct research on topics that they are curious about. They do not take any random question and start a research on it. Your interest in the topic means that you will happily work and have better end result.

Where can I find research topics? ›

Articles, reports in academic journals and books are all useful sources of research topics. Review articles in particular often indicate areas in which more research may be required.

What is the most effective type of research question? ›

In general, however, a good research question should be: Clear and focused. In other words, the question should clearly state what the writer needs to do. Not too broad and not too narrow.

What are the 4 main types of research? ›

There are four main types of Quantitative research: Descriptive, Correlational, Causal-Comparative/Quasi-Experimental, and Experimental Research.

Which comes first theory or research? ›

Summary.  Research and theory are actually two parallel processes having a symbiotic relationship. But theory comes after research because it is the research which is done before and the findings are used formulate theory.

What is a good qualitative research question? ›

Examples of qualitative research questions: What is it like growing up in a single-parent family in a rural environment? What are the experiences of people working night shifts in health care? How would overweight people describe their meal times while dieting?

What is phenomenon in psychology? ›

More broadly, a phenomenon is a fundamental psychological process that has theoretically deduced antecedents and consequences and thereby helps explain human cognitions, feelings and behaviors. Whether ego depletion is an effect or a phenomenon is debatable.

What is the role of research in terms of explaining phenomena? ›

Research is the process of collecting and analyzing information to increase our understanding of phenomena. This process of inquiry can be as simple as investigating through observation or as complex as experimenting to establish a cause-effect relationship for the events we investigate.

Which research paradigm is most concerned? ›

Q.Which research paradigm is not much concerned about generalizing its findings?
B.qualitative research
C.mixed research
D.none of the above
Answer» b. qualitative research
1 more row

What is natural phenomena example? ›

Types of natural phenomena include: Weather, fog, thunder, tornadoes; biological processes, decomposition, germination; physical processes, wave propagation, erosion; tidal flow, moonbow, blood moon and natural disasters such as electromagnetic pulses, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, midnight sun and polar night.

A list created by: Lee Sonogan Science gives as the most absolute truths. The world is so complex that there are many truths. All of it backed up by resource, experiments and information. These the…

The world is so complex that there are many truths.. These theories describe natural law and give ideas how the universe works.. 30 Interesting Scientific Theories: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale evolution.. Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion are three scientific laws describing the motion of planets around the Sun.. Unlike the Big Bang Theory where the universe began from a singularity, the Ekpyrotic Model of the Universe suggests that the universe arose from the collision of two three-dimensional worlds in space.. According to some scientists, if white holes exist then they may be linked to black holes in the exact manner we just described.. The anthropic principle states that every universe in the multiverse has an infinite range of different properties and physical laws, and that we are here because the universe where we are is hospitable.. According to the Clockwork Universe Theory , the universe is just like a mechanical clock controlled by a supreme being who uses the laws of physics as its gears to make everything in the world determinable.. The Zoo Theory suggests that aliens exist but would never make their presence known to humanity so they cannot exert an influence on human development.. Newton’s Laws of Motion is the Law of Inertia, and the Second Law of Motion expresses the relationship between force, mass and acceleration.. The overarching idea in fiction theory is that the relationships between the imaginary worlds of fiction and the actual world in which we live are complicated, and that one ought not dismiss fiction as simply stories that are not “true,” .. The Cell Theory is a scientific theory which describes the properties of cells.

Why do we do the things we do? Despite our best attempts to "know thyself," the truth is that we often know astonishingly little about our own minds, and even less about the way others think. As Charles Dickens once put it, “A wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human creature is constituted to be that profound secret and mystery to every other.”

The researchers, led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, set up a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psych building and selected 24 undergraduates (who had no criminal record and were deemed psychologically healthy) to act as prisoners and guards.. In 1998, researchers from Harvard and Kent State University targeted pedestrians on a college campus to determine how much people notice about their immediate environments.. "The shock experiments reveal not blind obedience but conflicting moral tendencies that lie deep within.". Those who were paid $1 to lie rated the tasks as more enjoyable than those who were paid $20.. Stereotyping various groups of people based on social group, ethnicity or class is something nearly all of us do, even if we make an effort not to -- and it can lead us to draw unfair and potentially damaging conclusions about entire populations.

Have any problems with assignments on the history? We have gathered a list of the best history research paper topics for college students.

To simplify your choice, we have compiled several lists of good topics for a history research paper.. World history is quite broad and diverse research area, which covers a significant period of time: from the rise of civilizations to more recent events, such as dreadful wars of the 20 th century and development of social movements.. Therefore, there are many interesting world history research topics to choose from.. You can write about any period of US history; for example, the Pre-Columbian era, colonial period, the American Revolution, the Federal period, the Gilded Age, the Great Depression, or the Cold War.. Interesting European history research paper topics on World War I:. Good topics for a European history research paper on World War II:. Good topics for a European history research paper on World War II:. Let’s start with ancient art history research paper topics:. 18-19 th -century art topics:. Modern art history research paper topics:. By far, these are just a few research paper topics on history.

Situs judi slot online ini sudah mengantongi lisensi resmi, jadi anda tidak perlu lagi meragukan keasliannya. Paling Gacor Se-Indonesia

Mulai dari salah satu game slot terbaik yang memiliki nilai RTP tinggi hingga 95%, penyedia slot terlengkap, banyak bonus harian dan mingguan dengan denominasi besar, transaksi deposit dan withdraw yang sangat mudah dan cepat hingga Nilai jackpot berkisar ratusan jutaan rupiah!. Saat ini terdapat ribuan member aktif di situs judi slot online ini setiap harinya, membuktikan bahwa kami adalah salah satu situs judi slot online resmi yang terpercaya.. Banyak para penjudi yang ingin mendapatkan penghasilan tambahan dari permainan slot online, maka dari itu situs Pragmatic Play merupakan salah satu situs judi slot online yang menawarkan jackpot terbesar.. Slot Terpercaya adalah slot yang mudah dimenangkan dengan tampilan permainan klasik, ada beberapa pecinta slot yang lebih suka bermain dengan tampilan klasik.. Dengan tampilan yang lebih menarik dari mesin slot klasik, disertai dengan grafik dan efek suara yang mengiringi permainan, mesin slot video lebih diminati oleh para pemain slot online.. Berikut adalah nama-nama situs judi slot #1 terbaik dan terpercaya dengan jackpot slot besar dan tentunya kemenangan mudah yang wajib dimainkan oleh para pemula di situs judi online ini:. Slot Online PRAGMATIC PLAY INDONESIA Slot Online MICROGAMING Slot Online JOKER123 Slot Online ONETOUCH GAMING Slot Online HABANERO Slot Online Play’ n Go Slot Online Playtech Slot Online Spadegaming Slot Online YGGDrasil Slot Online Slot88

Here is a list of 100 sociology research topics that you can use right now. These interesting sociology topics are updated frequently. Pick one!

Are you looking for the best sociology research topics?. However, we advise students to look at our sociology research topics list, pick the best topic for their needs, and then modify them.. Pick a sociology research paper topic from the following list and get the A+ or at least the A you need:. Social media is making us less social.. These sociology research topics are here for you.


1. Navigating the publishing process in Journals: Writing Impactful Research Programme (Session 14)
(Faculty of Management Studies, Sabaragamuwa Uni.)
2. Doing Research on Grand Challenges – How to make your research impactful
3. One Week FDP Program on "Impactful Academic Writing-A Qualitative Approach"
4. International Research Seminar Series 02 | Impactful Experimental Research: Methods in Research
(FLAME University)
(Vishal K Gupta)
6. One Week FDP Program on "Impactful Academic Writing-A Qualitative Approach"

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner

Last Updated: 05/02/2022

Views: 5862

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner

Birthday: 1994-06-25

Address: Suite 153 582 Lubowitz Walks, Port Alfredoborough, IN 72879-2838

Phone: +128413562823324

Job: IT Strategist

Hobby: Video gaming, Basketball, Web surfing, Book restoration, Jogging, Shooting, Fishing

Introduction: My name is Rev. Porsche Oberbrunner, I am a zany, graceful, talented, witty, determined, shiny, enchanting person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.